Collapse
No announcement yet.
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Page of 7
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New C&C - Don't Screw It, EA

    #1
    1. Remove pedo bears, school girls and other bs

    2. Remove all non sense vehicles like transformers, tanks that float etc, pretty much all RA3 new units. Focus on ground combat like in RA1 and RA2.

    3. Cut down on cartoon like graphics, make it darker and realistic

    4. Bring back harvesting like in RA1 and RA2, not this automatic stuff

    5. Bring back the real Tanya and not plastic doll that was invited for the only reason: so teenagers would buy RA3 because of her tits

    If you do this, there might still be a hope.

    Off-topic: Generals is not a c&c game and never will be.
    Last edited by DjiXas; 02-25-2011, 09:46 PM.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Seriously no need for threads like this, it brings down the tone of the forums.

    Comment

    • #3
      1) Bears, school girls, etc are good for circus Red Alert universe. In RA1 and RA2 we had dancing Stalin, squids, floating discs, etc.

      2) If they're balanced, why not ? Something new must be ingame. In RA2:YR we had "transformer" - soviet helicopter, that can deploy and fire, like artillery

      3) Fully agree about graphic. C&C3 graphic was the best of all games. C&C4 had nice fog-of-war effects. Red Alert 3 had very nice water.

      4) Harvesting is ok in C&C3:KW. With 1400/2800 per harvester, $3000 refineries are best solution vs spam. $2000 refs are ok with 700/1400 income.

      But who knows, maybe it will be totally different game with new universe (or Generals 2 with new resourse system)

      Comment

      • #4
        Last time I bashed all the concepts, everyone praised and look what happened with CnC4.

        Developers should only listen to guys who played C&C from the day 1

        @Existor, and that's why Yuri's Revenge was garbage, it deviated too much.
        Last edited by DjiXas; 02-25-2011, 09:48 PM.

        Comment

        • #5
          Originally posted by DjiXas View Post
          Last time I bashed all the concepts, everyone praised and look what happened with CnC4.

          Ignore those people and listen to guys who played C&C from the day 1

          @Existor, and that's why Yuri's Revenge was garbage.
          I am one of those guys who have played from day 1, just i dont see the point in living in the past with its mistakes and all, its a new team give them chance to mak something before demanding things its not constructive, nor does it help anyones mood.

          Also i thought we all agreed CnC4 was not canon, and not real????

          Comment

          • #6
            The next CNC should be an RTS version of BF3.

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by RedAlert2008 View Post
              I am one of those guys who have played from day 1, just i dont see the point in living in the past with its mistakes and all, its a new team give them chance to mak something before demanding things its not constructive, nor does it help anyones mood.

              Also i thought we all agreed CnC4 was not canon, and not real????
              When they will "make things", it will already be too late.

              If you played from day one, then you know what makes it a C&C game and that there is zero of such vibe in new titles.

              Comment

              • #8
                hmm... thought your first sentence was weird, but now I see what you mean. Bears are a common pet in russian so tehy added it to the soviet army, nothing to do with pedo bear.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by DjiXas View Post
                  When they will "make things", it will already be too late.

                  If you played from day one, then you know what makes it a C&C game and there there is zero of such vibe in new titles.
                  Actually RA3 had the CnC vibe ish, TW/KW definatly did and yet you continue to tell them the world is at an end. Yet they have accepted mistakes were made. Now what is needed is the Community to be behind them, until we get some more info on a new game rather than jumping down there throats at every opportunity.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Tbh as long as it is fun and the story isn't a miasma of failure I don't care if people consider it a C&C...

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Go back to the formula of win.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Vanilla generals basics, 3 Faction, gen points, dozers, hero units that are awesome like in gens + new campaign/story to keep single play buffs happy + new graphics/engine + support(patches/tournaments/community interaction) + more upgrades

                        = win

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          RA3 was good. Even Tanya. Yes, there could have been things that be improved on.

                          C&C4 was fail

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by ScotlanD View Post
                            Vanilla generals basics, 3 Faction, gen points, dozers, hero units that are awesome like in gens + new campaign/story to keep single play buffs happy + new graphics/engine + support(patches/tournaments/community interaction) + more upgrades

                            = win
                            No.

                            WESTWOOD!

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Adder24 View Post
                              No.

                              WESTWOOD!
                              How about both?

                              Comment

                              1 2 3 4 7 Next
                              X