Search:

na were up by about 60 or 70.

the results are false

It's more of a right way or wrong way to do it, rather then a strategy. A strategy is more of a gameplan on how your gonna do something, when it comes to SP, once you figure it out, it works every...

Also last post then i g2g..

The most important thing is the Gameplay bottem line, not the SP... Some people may enjoy playing the SP but thats not what you should look at when deciding which game...

Well like i said, TS was made in a period of time were the main focus of an RTS would be its SP. While gens is the opposite, and in the present no RTS is made for its SP anymore. Personally I would...

Im not saying its MP, im saying you get more of a full gameplay experience from it since it's not scripted.

I dont understand how you can judge an RTS on the SP alone... Playing the SP doesn't allow you to recieve the full experience of the gameplay of that specific game..

Actually spamming skirmish...

Single Player is good and all, but once its over its over, so you beat your SP on TS do you just throw the game away, or you gonna beat it another 50x? Also Single Player doesn't challenge you like...

Also, TS was made in a time period were multiplayer gaming was not that big, TS was what mid 90's? Gens was created at a time where multiplayer gaming began to get huge.. So the focus was on the MP...

Subfactions give ZH some uniqueness, but it's impossible to balance a game when you have 9 different armies, so in the end have 3 armies is much better.

yeah they delete the post cuz i provide proof were not making multis, but clearly who ever has mod powers is TS fan so he delete evidence n hope vote gets overturned ****

http://forums.commandandconquer.com/jforum/user/profile/3142.page

lol someone keeps deleting my posts.

Obviously had to vote for Gens, best game ever.