Vote for a Generals 2 and comment!

[ScotlanD]

sci-fi elements

are gay

I can agree with that. But then, in essence, it wouldn't be Generals anymore, would it? :P

If anything, a Generals or Generals-like C&C game should focus on a different kind of GLA, not just middle-eastern terrorists, but rather something more akin to the Consortium in Act of War, where, yes, they do have access to all these rebel factions in the middle east and terrorists, but are uncentralized, sort of like The Brotherhood of Nod, and are even associated to certain large oil, technology & military companies, PMCs and even some corrupt affiliations to 1st World countries. (Another example would be the Order of Nations from "End of Nations", but much less high-tech.) In terms of factions, I'd like see something like a standardized NATO (IE similiar to the Allies in RA2 and RA3), China (Where did it say they were Communist?), and some Consortium-like faction; Sort of like what Generals was originally going to have in its alpha version.

Additionally, I'd like: Live-Action, some sci-fi elements, a mysterious enemy (Think Kane, Yuri, CABAL, where you don't fully understand their motives, but not as cliche nor focused on a single person/entity), focusing on characters and political aspect story-wise, etc. Basically, something that could be akin to TD, TW, RA and RA2.

I could like it, then.

And I don't agree that the gameplay was very unique. It was much like StarCraft, and elements of it remained in C&C3. (The loathsome Tank spam...gah. Though that was also in RA1 and RA2.)

What I disliked: Ugly textures for: vehicles, terrain, most structures, infantry (I'm looking at you, GLA Rebel), no real story mode, no faction identity in terms of lore, overuse of Nukes & toxins. (China? Nukes? They're not North Korea, or terrorists, you know...)

I disagree, gameplay was nothing like starcraft the games are miles apart.. err tank spam? come spam tanks see what happens

Ugly textures? this game being made at same time as YR... its was a huge leap forward, its still quite beautiful to look at !!!

No real story I agree though but the factions were cool and well done, overdone on purpose to make it fun, which it it did well (should also keep in mind its in a future where china has become very nuclear reliant )

[gwandi]

Ugly textures? this game being made at same time as YR... its was a huge leap forward, its still quite beautiful to look at !!!

No it's not, it looks quite terrible now.

[ScotlanD]

I guess... if your blind.



2 year gap



what 5 years later?

[gwandi]

Yeah it was an improvement from YR but nowadays it just looks fugly especially compared to the newer games like C&C3 and RA3

[ScotlanD]

it looks a million times better than ra3, especially considering its over 8 years old! its the same engine just heavily modified to the point where it looks ****

cc3/kw are much better though texture wise and lighting

[gwandi]

it looks a million times better than ra3, especially considering its over 8 years old! its the same engine just heavily modified to the point where it looks ****

cc3/kw are much better though texture wise and lighting

rofl in no way does it look better than RA3

[ScotlanD]

no way dose it not hahaha

ra3 is barley even at all playable just down to the horrible visuals

generals look, feel and effects blow ra3 out of the water(which was the only thing that looks better in ra3 compared to gens funnily enough)

[gwandi]

no way dose it not hahaha

ra3 is barley even at all playable just down to the horrible visuals

generals look, feel and effects blow ra3 out of the water(which was the only thing that looks better in ra3 compared to gens funnily enough)

You're obviously blind but w/e...

[ScotlanD]

If I am I blame RA3 then

[gwandi]

If I am I blame RA3 then

Shouldn't have used yellow as a team color then.