Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 65

Thread: Less betraying

  1. #41
    Why are we always the ones getting betrayed??? I wanna betray people for once!

  2. #42
    Lieutenant Colonel =LEVIATHEN='s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Offshore Colony 37
    Posts
    2,131
    Quote Originally Posted by Plrsvek View Post
    Why are we always the ones getting betrayed??? I wanna betray people for once!
    Hey, that's a good idea! At one point in the game, you should be able to choose to break off from your faction and either fight against both the other side and your original faction, ally with the other side and keep your faction type, or go to the other side entirely.

  3. #43
    Corporal Lorde_Augusto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    30
    Ha! To be the one betraing would be very fun, it could even serve as a way to make the game more hard, think about it, in the middle of the campaing you have the chance to choose sides, if you stay with your faction is the easy mode, everyone knows you and you gets the more advanced toys, if you go to the enemy you need to get they to accept you so you need to use low tier weapons for some time is the normal mode, and if you go solo you need to stole technology if you want bigger guns you are alone the Hard mode...

  4. #44
    Lieutenant sgfan206's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Hiigara
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by =LEVIATHEN= View Post
    Hey, that's a good idea! At one point in the game, you should be able to choose to break off from your faction and either fight against both the other side and your original faction, ally with the other side and keep your faction type, or go to the other side entirely.
    Indeed, that would be something new. In "Emperor - Battle for Dune" you were actually able to choose wheter you are fighting for the Harkonnen Baron or on the side of his son's brother, who wants to kill him. Was a pretty nice (and damn hard) mission.

    It would really be nice, if there were several ways how to achieve victory, however, just make the end being one and the same. Just as in "Emperor".

  5. #45
    Captain Lord-Vale3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Logan, Utah, USA
    Posts
    504
    Actually, Ackerman didnt betray anybody, he was acting in the interests of his country. (Notice that in the Allied campaign, we destroy Ackerman, in the EOTRS campaign, the disguise is blown and the allies figure it out without destroying him.)

    If in the allied campaign he truly was a robot however, I feel that the player did more betraying than 'Ackerman' did, as the commander never learns that Ackerman is in fact actually a spy. As an American commander, I would have stood by my president, and Warren should have as well. Every time I play that mission I wish so badly to just go blast Warrens base into smithereens, contact Allied command and say 'SCREW YOU', and then surrender to Ackerman.


    Just my two cents about that. I dont think there should be so much betrayal in CnC anymore either, its too common. I liked how in RA1, there was no betraying on the allied side at all. The stuff in the Soviet campaign, thats just how the soviets were, and it added to the atmosphere, made playing Soviet feel darker.
    http://www.commandandconquer.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=174&dateline=12986051  82

  6. #46
    Lieutenant
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord-Vale3 View Post
    Actually, Ackerman didnt betray anybody, he was acting in the interests of his country. (Notice that in the Allied campaign, we destroy Ackerman, in the EOTRS campaign, the disguise is blown and the allies figure it out without destroying him.)

    If in the allied campaign he truly was a robot however, I feel that the player did more betraying than 'Ackerman' did, as the commander never learns that Ackerman is in fact actually a spy. As an American commander, I would have stood by my president, and Warren should have as well. Every time I play that mission I wish so badly to just go blast Warrens base into smithereens, contact Allied command and say 'SCREW YOU', and then surrender to Ackerman.


    Just my two cents about that. I dont think there should be so much betrayal in CnC anymore either, its too common. I liked how in RA1, there was no betraying on the allied side at all. The stuff in the Soviet campaign, thats just how the soviets were, and it added to the atmosphere, made playing Soviet feel darker.
    i surrendered to Ackerman as soon as i saw that canon !
    Quote Originally Posted by m4dn3ss View Post
    Realism is overrated

  7. #47
    Colonel Klandri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Iceland, Blue Zone B15
    Posts
    3,080
    Quote Originally Posted by RKTGX95 View Post
    i surrendered to Ackerman as soon as i saw that canon !
    So you didn't finish the mission?
    Quote Originally Posted by Borreh View Post
    Also, if anyone here is famous, it's Cypher for the above, Kermanit for trolling, Klandri for being an incarnation of Satan and CNCGeek for 1984.

    The rest is expendable.
    And Borreh for being featured in a spammer's valuable member's signature.

    As the moderator in chief I am obligated to remind you that if you use reddit subscribe to /r/commandandconquer

  8. #48
    Lieutenant Colonel =LEVIATHEN='s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Offshore Colony 37
    Posts
    2,131
    Quote Originally Posted by Klandri View Post
    So you didn't finish the mission?
    DESYNCRONIZED: The commander did not surrender to Ackerman.

  9. #49
    I dont mind little betraying,if it fits in good story and character then fine....not like pointless betraying in RA3...
    And this topic remind me on Starcraft campaign XD
    Starcraft campaign is full of betraying,every single character there betray some one or has been betrayed....parody

  10. #50
    I TRY TO BEHAVE
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    702
    Ah, Ackerman's stunt would have her to whole allied movement and allow the Rising Sun to regain the monentum so for the goood of the USA he had to go

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Victory Games is Electronic Arts' dedicated Strategy Gaming studio. Formed in 2010 under the leadership of Jon Van Caneghem, Victory Games has offices in Los Angeles, CA; Austin, TX; and Shanghai, China and is currently focused on the Command & Conquer franchise.