Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 88 of 88
  1. #81
    Brigadier General Commander32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    LV, NV, USA
    Posts
    4,114
    if we were able to develop each subfaction in a way thats represented in their fashion, yeah that would be nice, but we just need a lot of work to be done.

    My quote:
    'Meh, I don't really care anymore about the new games direction, with many loads of hours(make that years actually) on Tib Sun, YR, Generals, CnC3, and RA3, plus all the mods they come with, another game with the same old formula is rather redundant IMO. '

  2. #82
    Lieutenant Colonel Commander_McNash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    South America
    Posts
    2,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Commander32 View Post
    if we were able to develop each subfaction in a way thats represented in their fashion, yeah that would be nice, but we just need a lot of work to be done.
    Well, the trick to make a very remarakable faction is to make everything work around an idea, for example tanks, defensive gameplay, suicide units, stealth, toxines, laser, airforce, infantry, etc.
    Live well. It is the greatest revenge... And be the salt and light of Earth.



    ♦► My deviantART page, C&C stuff and more! ◄♦

  3. #83
    Major Heron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,485
    Quote Originally Posted by stephanovich View Post
    I like the idea of the RA1 system actually. Never really liked the RA2 one as you more or less always took the same one since one, maybe 2 countries will always have a better unit that can be used whereas the RA1 system can cater better towards your playstyle.
    How's this for a compromise between the subfactions idea and the countries idea? I had this idea in my avoid clone wars thread, but it wouldn't do harm to repeat here again.

    Instead of having specific countries like China and USA, we will have a Pan-China bloc, and a Western bloc, then GLA.

    Then, for all 3 blocs, the countries play style comes in. What this does is to assign a RA1 style value adjustment to your units, such as an increase in armor, an increase in speed, an increase in attack speed, etc. This is however reflected on the unit designs and models. You have, for example, the M1 Abrams for the US, the Challenger 2 for the UK and the Leopard 2 for the Germans in MBT design. They share the same cannon, yet have different properties here and there to differentiate them enough. Use that to help with the differentiating. For infantry, like training a special force, use the relevant naming convention for them, like SEAL for the US, SAS for the British.

    Of course, there will be unique units inserted in here and there to showcase the specialties of the faction, like how US could be about Air Superiority, and has more jet options to choose from, like the F15 and the F22 can be chosen from, but it involves tradeoffs so one chooses his aircraft based on his style of play and can mix it up as well. The Germans could be all about the tanks, and how they introduce tank destroyers, stronger mobile artillery, and stuff. The British brings with it a good mix of infantry, espionage and showcases a more combined arms approach to the battle, requiring a mix of armor and infantry to win the day.

    It probably requires rendering work on the level of ZH, KW and perhaps even more, but such faction diversity means that you have the visual impact of not playing the same side even if they are of the same coalition.

    I will respect your opinion as long as you respect mine.

  4. #84
    Private Lebelge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    15
    I hope the return of GLA, China and USA. Why do you want to change a winnning team ? ... Of course, new units, new sub factions, new generals are heavily recommended !

  5. #85
    Corporal NixonZz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    France
    Posts
    32
    Comment guys!

  6. #86
    Corporal NixonZz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    France
    Posts
    32
    up!!!! NEW IDEAS OF NEW MEMBERS ?

  7. #87
    The My Little Pony Squad?

    The Justin Bieber fangirl club?

    The giant ants?

    Okay I've just created a new universe, but on topic I'd say make Europe the new faction

  8. #88
    Major CnC_Fin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Blue Zone B-1 / Finland
    Posts
    1,394
    So now we know that there will be EU and GLA. The yet-to-be-revelealed third faction might be USA or China. Persuming that it's either one of them, maybe Russia, though a lot more serious than Soviet is in RA games. Perhaps Japan? Though adding Russia or Japan might make the game look more like a sequel to RA3 Uprising rather than Generals 2.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Victory Games is Electronic Arts' dedicated Strategy Gaming studio. Formed in 2010 under the leadership of Jon Van Caneghem, Victory Games has offices in Los Angeles, CA; Austin, TX; and Shanghai, China and is currently focused on the Command & Conquer franchise.