IDEA: New Faction in a Gen 2 ? China,GLA,USA and... Comment!

[Kellogen]

Its more that within subject of topic within discussion or conversation that there a fairly fewer limitations from what i know of with what has been done. What else would there to be said at times? Given that i think a patch was needed for any differences also.

[RedAlert2008]

Its more that within subject of topic within discussion or conversation that there a fairly fewer limitations from what i know of with what has been done. What else would there to be said at times? Given that i think a patch was needed for any differences also.

wut now??

You want a patch for a game that hasnt even been released yet?

[Kellogen]

On idea of topic within any subject of conversation, probably not. But outside that though is probably within some form of expectation within release.

[TonyP7]

A 4th??? hmm how about Russia? that is Red Alert like? well 3 is much of the world China in the East, GLA in the middle and USA in the West. Scandinavia? (North....well I think that would be not like a SUPER POWER and would be Allies with USA)

1 Factions in ZH had Generals. that was nice and made the game soooo much bigger

2 Subfactions? how about a little nautral faction that can be captured (kinda like building) E.G mutans in C&C tiberium universe

Like Zapatagious sead Africa, but thats not tech like.. would been a nice easter egg

[Kellogen]

In terms of themes and their basis, finding faction out of no where, is probably hard placed. Given all that would within place would be within some means of "theme" . To say one cant be , might be. But of it might be within complexity of place. Also is development to a point. Even though alot of fiction to say, it has a basis of non-fiction to it. To one extent or another. Of it is rather to put anymore development into releases then probably needed. Given what is anything or not. Alot of based around the idea of comupter gaming and warfare. And of it to have means of gameplay. Some of more balanced with approach then probably others. Given Sci-Fi is out there. Even to a sense it all is. But basis of it isnt.

Like on the idea of TD i think on later releases had taken more a Sci-fi pitch to things in greater extend then what was considered to be. RA releases placed within themselves another Alt aspect of the CnC universe.

New Factions in Gens of choices to make reasonably put without too much an addition. Idk. Even though HD-DVDs and Blu-rays are out. Double discs i dont know if they will do again or not. Might not be needed, i dont know.

Even though on the serieses of releases Russia is based within one of course. But given on the development and release of another. Can to a point place them maybe within means to have, idk. Right now, i dont think any see any reason of arguement or question. Given it is Generals release to say. Of if they have taken whatever for their anyways. Given EA entitlement of course.

[Commander_McNash]

Posting doesnt really quite work for replyies or qoutes. Just New threads. Otherwise it would probably say im here when im really here.

If thats your concern/compliant.

What do you think about the possibilities of adding a new faction on Generals? I know some people is eager to see Russia, but I think China takes most of its traits.

[Moongrave]

What is the point of a fourth faction anyway

3 is enough

[Zaptagious]

What is the point of a fourth faction anyway

3 is enough

then one could say:

"what's the point of a third faction anyway

2 is enough"

It adds diversity.

[stephanovich]

then one could say:

"what's the point of a third faction anyway

2 is enough"

It adds diversity.

The more factions you bring into play, the higher the chance of the factions becoming more identical. There is only so much that you can do to differentiate the factions and you are limiting each factions campaign length as well most likely.

[TonyP7]

how about more generals? or is there room for more of them?