Nukes in Command and Conquer Generals 2?

[Kyang]

You just described all the things that made the China campaign fun to play.

It was very fun fiction. Too bad nothing like that happened anywhere else in the game. So I can understand why the Chinese were a little agitated.

[GammaCobra]

How about we have some sort of a tech structure that deploys a small nuke warhead when a infantry unit captures it?

[Victimizer]

Only if the third faction is Japanese.

Then we should have a lot of nukes.

[ConKid66]

Only if the third faction is Japanese.

Then we should have a lot of nukes.

I doubt it, seeing as how the inclusion of Japan was the real reason nukes weren't in RA3.

[Victimizer]

I doubt it, seeing as how the inclusion of Japan was the real reason nukes weren't in RA3.

Yes, I know. That's why I made the comment.

[toti]

i love nukes so i want to be able to use them

[CnC_Fin]

With FB2 engine I bet the nuke would look hot dayumm terrific.

[Revanchist]

There have been exactly two C&C games with no nukes.

Let's keep it that way.

[Alex06]

Tiberian Sun didn't have Nukes and nobody whined. Besides, no sane man would even think of using nuclear weapons. I think many people are too stuck inside their little C&C fantasy to realize how ridiculously obscene such a thing would be. It was ridiculous enough in Generals 1, so please, no nukes.

[RealWar]

Tiberian Sun didn't have Nukes and nobody whined. Besides, no sane man would even think of using nuclear weapons. I think many people are too stuck inside their little C&C fantasy to realize how ridiculously obscene such a thing would be. It was ridiculous enough in Generals 1, so please, no nukes.

I know, nukes aren't realistic! Come on guys! G2 shouldn't have nukes, or VTOL's, or blue-flame rockets, or blah blah blah!

In all seriousness, we don't even know what the third faction is yet. I'd prefer nukes for China, but if there isn't: deal with it. However, it does raise the question, if China is the third faction, and there aren't nukes, what is their superweapon going to be?