Gameplay Or Realism?

[Commander32]

A response to this thread.
http://www.commandandconquer.com/for...560#post106560

Name says it all.


I won't put any real definition on these, just go what you think is best, make your own explanation.


For me its gameplay.
In the long run, this is what makes the game playable in the first place, where it allows us to do a replay over again.

A game that has high graphic and realistic looks yet has a crapastic gameplay really isnt a good game overall IMO.

[Kyang]

Too vague.

[Commander32]

Too vague.

Theres no need for explanation, just go what you think is best in your opinion.
You can explain why its important in your eyes if you like.

[mirza044]

Both!

[mirza044]

Sorry for double post.

[Commander32]

Nah, I won't force to give you guys a strictly fixed definition on the factors, no need, just go what you know and believe lol.
Better that way.

[Borreh]

The poll is described in such way that implies that a good gameplay cannot be realistic. No one sane would choose realism because it, in the terms of the poll, would automaticaly mean the game will have poor gameplay.

So please, if you want to have a "realistic vs arcade gameplay" poll, make it properly.

[Commander32]

The poll is described in such way that implies that a good gameplay cannot be realistic. No one sane would choose realism because it, in the terms of the poll, would automaticaly mean the game will have poor gameplay.

So please, if you want to have a "realistic vs arcade gameplay" poll, make it properly.

heh, I never implied it so, never did.

[Borreh]

heh, I never implied it so, never did.

The poll says otherwise.

[Commander32]

For you maybe, but I think not.

In any case, just make you own explanation.